1;1 Introduction: Facing Global Environmental Change and Sectorialization of Security;66 1.1;Hans Günter Brauch;66 1.1.1;1.1 Introductory Remark;66 1.1.1.1;1. The emergence as a new multidisciplinary scientific field of study since the 1970's and 1980's that has focused on climate ch...;66 1.1.1.2;2. The development of a new major policy field of international (environment) policy since the Earth Summit (UN Conference on En...;66 1.1.1.3;3. Since the early 21st century this process of politicization has been complemented by a process of declaring selected global c...;66 1.1.2;1.2 Scientific Research on Global Environmental and Climate Change and Political Agenda- Setting;67 1.1.2.1;Table 1.1: Worldviews on Security and Standpoints on Environmental Issues: Source: Brauch 2003, 2005, 2005a).;69 1.1.3;Hobbes, Morgenthau, Waltz;69 1.1.4;(neo)realist;69 1.1.5;(pessimist);69 1.1.6;Power matters;69 1.1.7;Grotius;69 1.1.8;liberal pragmatist;69 1.1.9;Cooperation matters;69 1.1.10;Kant;69 1.1.11;Neo-liberal institutionalist (optimist);69 1.1.12;International law matters and prevails;69 1.1.12.1;I: the (neo)realist and Neo-Malthusian pessimist for whom only military, economic, and political power matters to face and cope with resource scarcity, and who often acts unilaterally;;69 1.1.12.2;V: the liberal and equity-oriented pragmatist for whom multilateral cooperation (in international organizations, regimes) matters and can solve challenges.;69 1.1.12.3;IX: the combination of Kantian ideas and Cornucopian optimism that democracies, the rule of law and international law, but also new technologies, can solve the new global environmental challenges.;69 1.1.12.4;1.3 Politicization of Global Environmental Change;70 1.1.12.4.1;1.3.1 Global Policy Debate on Environmental Security;70 1.1.12.4.2;1.3.1.1 Environmental Security Debate within the United Nations System;71 1.1.12.4.3;1.3.1.2 Environmental Security Debate of OSCE;71 1.1.12.4.4;1.3.1.3 Appling Environmental Security: The ENVSEC Initiative;72 1.1.12.4.4.1;1. vulnerability assessment and on monitoring environment and security linkages,;73 1.1.12.4.4.2;2. policy development and implementation,;73 1.1.12.4.4.3;3. institutional development, capacity building, and advocacy.;73 1.1.12.4.5;1.3.1.4 Environmental Security Research and Dialogue supported by NATO;73 1.1.12.4.6;1.3.1.5 Environmental Security Debate in OECD Documents;74 1.1.12.4.7;1.3.1.6 Environmental Security Concerns and the EU's Green Diplomacy;74 1.1.12.4.7.1;Figure 1.1: Green Diplomacy Milestones June 2003-June 2005. Source: European Commission; at: .;76 1.1.12.4.8;1.3.1.7 Environmental Security Initiatives in Latin America, Africa, and the Asia Pacific;76 1.1.12.4.9;1.3.2 The Global Policy Debate on Human Security;77 1.1.12.5;1.4 Mapping the Global Reconceptualization of Security and Environment Linkages in the Anthropocene;78 1.1.12.5.1;Table 1.2: Vertical Levels and Horizontal Dimensions of Security in North and South;79 1.1.13;Military;79 1.1.14;Political;79 1.1.15;Economic;79 1.1.16;Environmental;79 1.1.17;Societal;79 1.1.18;The sectoral security concepts cut across;79 1.1.19;dimensions and referent objects;79 1.1.20;563 energy, food , health, water, and livelihood 456;79 1.1.20.1;1.5 Sectorialization of Security and Sectoral Security Concepts;79 1.1.20.2;1.6 Focus and Contribution of this Book;80 1.1.20.2.1;1.6.1 Part I: Contextualization of Global Environmental Change;80 1.1.20.2.2;1.6.2 Part II: Securitization of Global Environmental Change;80 1.1.20.2.3;1.6.3 Part III: Securitization of Extreme Natural and Societal Outcomes;81 1.1.20.2.4;1.6.4 Part IV: Energy Security for the 21st Century;82 1.1.20.2.5;1.6.5 Food Security for the 21st Century;82 1.1.20.2.6;1.6.6 Livelihood and Health Security for the 21st Century;83 1.1.20.2.7;1.6.7 Water Security for the 21st Century;83 1.1.20.2.8;1.6.8 Environmental Security Concepts and Debates;84 1.1.20.2.9;1.6.9 Part IX: